“2b or Not 2b?” Not only did texting become a whole new way of communicating, it started a trend in how things could be communicated. In David Crystal’s article, “2b or Not 2b?” he discusses how some people have taken abbreviations to the extreme when texting, but that it is not necessarily a new idea or one that is particularly bad for the English language. Texting is a recent phenomenon that exploded In 2b or Not 2b, David Crystal addresses the concerns many people have about texting, its impact on our language. As a parent of a teenager, and a future teacher, this subject was a concern to me. At first, I had thought that there could be adverse effect from texting. Read More Apr 10, · After reading “2b or Not 2b” by David Crystal, complete the following assignment: Your goal is to list/identify and explain 3 rhetorical strategies that Crystal uses throughout this piece. So, for. example, you see him comparing and contrasting: you are going to identify the strategy, and tell me A) where. he uses it, B) why he uses it, and C) whether or not it is effective
2b or Not 2b” by David Crystal. - Network Essay
He uses it as emphasis and as another source of similar writing to his to add effectiveness to his thesis. By quoting someone else, there is a bigger impression left as outside sources are brought in. It is not an issue of making a new language of texting. Education teaches us how to spell. Texting is meant to be a lazy way of communication. Like Like. It can be a way to strengthen his points and get he point across more effectively.
I agree in a way with his opinion. We are in a way creating our own language while almost completely disregarding the english language. But texting is a way to quickly talk with someone else and some people are too lazy to spell the entire word out. This is how our generation communicates, quickly and in a lazy way. Crystal uses Humphrys as an outside source that shares his opinion. He also is very specific in the source he picked as someone who is versed in literature therefore giving him a valid voice on the issue.
Humphrys is a newspaper journalists which means that he has read and digested a lot of literature and continues to on a daily basis which means that he can spot overarching trends of writing. all this makes Crystals claim valid and reliable in his article.
also since i to use the text lingo for convenience i am probably part of the problem. Crystal uses Humphrys as an outside source that states his point of view. He also uses some ideas in the source to be specific in his analysis. I agree with Humphrys argument because now texters are using their own communication or language to chat with their friends.
This generation, texting is more popular then speaking because everyone you see in the bus, train, restaurant, anywhere, is looking on his phone for texting. Nowadays, abbreviation in texting is cut the word shorter in order to be fast but not all know how to 2b or not 2b essay. To me, those who claim that people using a new set of spelling and words are vandals of languages, look arrogant to me. Languages are not holy grails that needs to be kept clean.
Few hundreds years ago, many educated people had criticized people writing stories in English, which was considered vulgar, instead of Latin; it is ironic for me to see people making claims like that, as Humphry would have been attacked of ruining languages if he were lived few centuries ago. He is using texting as his argument point. I had to look those words up to what 2b or not 2b essay actually means. I carfully assume that 2b or not 2b essay words will lead to cause the problems of blocking communication with different generation people.
It is a very strong and powerful quote, because the vocabulary that he used was aggressive and straightforward. But in someway, I do agree the new technologies in this world are replacing some of the old fashion way. A lot of things are becoming digital instead of paper. Humphry argues that texting is destroying our language and that it must be stopped. Texters are definitely vandalizing the language, but would they be able communicate through vandalized language if they did not understand what they were saying?
To vandalize a language, — which they use to communicate — the vandals would have to first know what they plan to destroy. So although vandalizing is bad, some would learn the language which would ultimately lower the illiteracy rate as Crystal would argue, 2b or not 2b essay.
I am neutral in regard to the idea that texting shortened writings is destroying the language. I think to some level this is right because the language might be vandalized through needless shortening of words, sentences and so on. But language has changed and always have been changing since it is a tool that we use. And right now the tool needs fit right into our current society which favors fast paced communication especially among young population.
So I 2b or not 2b essay it as a part of the evolution of language as a tool. Crystals then points out that abbreviated form of English have predated back before text messaging was introduced, 2b or not 2b essay. He also used studies from a 2b or not 2b essay at Conventry University to show that we require strong understanding of English before we can play around with abbreviated form of it.
Therefore I strongly believe and agrees with David Crystals claim that what texting is bringing upon us is but an evolution in our language. I do not fully agree with John because texting may in some way be affecting our language, but it is not as if we use texting 2b or not 2b essay when we write our school papers.
Sure, people may be texting everyday and using acronyms more than usual, but they also go to school everyday, so it is not as if the language they learned back in elementary school is becoming obsolete because they text everyday. In fact, they learn more than they lose. And they must be stopped.
If anything I would say that it does a small dent into our language but I believe most people know the difference between abbreviations in texting and actual writing. I also feel as if most people today actually spell out words completely instead of writing abbreviated, which might have something to do with spell check. You are commenting using your WordPress, 2b or not 2b essay.
com account. You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account, 2b or not 2b essay. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. UB English Spring Skip to content, 2b or not 2b essay. Share this: Twitter Facebook. Like this: Like Loading April 7, at pm. chrisveress says:. aidanobr says:. fbalde96 says:. jasonkimik says:.
April 8, at am. junhyeoperic says:, 2b or not 2b essay. teanchen says:. gunhoko says:. mayonaiserocket says:. dershent says:. May 9, at pm. wpaden says:. May 11, at am. pleasebeegentle says:. May 11, at pm, 2b or not 2b essay. gjalmont says:. May 22, at am. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:.
Email required Address never made public. Name required. eonjoopark Categories Announcement October M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 « May.
Search for:. Blog at WordPress. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy.
2BR02B by Kurt Vonnegut, audiobook with subtitles
, time: 17:24Discussion Board 14 | UB English Spring
Apr 10, · After reading “2b or Not 2b” by David Crystal, complete the following assignment: Your goal is to list/identify and explain 3 rhetorical strategies that Crystal uses throughout this piece. So, for. example, you see him comparing and contrasting: you are going to identify the strategy, and tell me A) where. he uses it, B) why he uses it, and C) whether or not it is effective Jun 19, · 06/16/ 2b or not 2b an essay. In the article “2b or not 2b” David Crystal starts out discussing how others such as John. Sutherland said that texting is destroying the English language. And Sutherland had. created names for the new language of texting like “textese”, “slanguage” and that texting. is a digital virus “2b or Not 2b?” Not only did texting become a whole new way of communicating, it started a trend in how things could be communicated. In David Crystal’s article, “2b or Not 2b?” he discusses how some people have taken abbreviations to the extreme when texting, but that it is not necessarily a new idea or one that is particularly bad for the English language. Texting is a recent phenomenon that exploded
No comments:
Post a Comment